FRESU ApS
APSBankruptAdvertising protectionCVR 17021737Væselvej 30, 7800 SkiveActivities of agents involved in non-specialised wholesale· NACE 4619Est. 1993 · 33 years old— employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessFRESU ApS is a Danish APS based in Skive, operating in the Activities of agents involved in non-specialised wholesale sector. Incorporated in 1993, the company reported revenue of DKK 1.9m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 1.9M DKK | +360% |
| EBITDA | 1M DKK | +2779% |
| Net profit | 0.6M DKK | +11065% |
| Total assets | 3.4M DKK | +189% |
| Equity | 0.5M DKK | +647% |
| Employees | — | — |
In its most recent annual report (2015), FRESU ApS reported revenue of DKK 1.9m, an increase of 360% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 4 annual filings covering 2012 to 2015. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 638.2k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 53.2%.
At the end of 2015, equity financed 15.7% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 1.3 times.
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,887 | 410 | 410 | 488 |
| Staff expenses | -675 | -375 | -375 | -436 |
| EBITDA | 1,003 | 35 | 35 | 52 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -8 | -8 | 12 |
| EBIT | 1,003 | 27 | 27 | 40 |
| Net financials | -295 | -20 | -20 | -32 |
| Profit before tax | 709 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Tax | 71 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Net profit | 638 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 3,448 | 1,193 | 1,193 | 1,201 |
| Equity | 540 | -99 | -99 | -104 |
| Long-term debt | 1,282 | 800 | 800 | 824 |
| Short-term debt | 1,626 | 492 | 492 | 481 |
| Total debt | 2,908 | 1,292 | 1,292 | 1,305 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
RK Audit | Audit | 1993 – 2004 |
PN Management | Management | 2014 – 2015 |
CR Management | Management | 1993 – 2004 |
JJ Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2015 – 2016 |
NC Management | Management | 2004 – 2014 |
LV Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2016 – 2017 |
No data on file.
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Poul Neumeyer | Management | 14 companiesMany roles |
| Christian Rosenkvist Elgaard | Management | 7 companiesMany roles |
| Robert Krogsgaard | Audit | 2 companies |
| James Jensen | Chief Executive Officer | 2 companies |