Compend AS is a Norwegian AS based in Hamar, operating in the Computer programming activities sector. Incorporated in 2023, the company reported revenue of NOK 273.8k in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 0.3M NOK | -66% |
| EBITDA | -3.2M NOK | -89% |
| Net profit | -3.5M NOK | -101% |
| Total assets | 5.2M NOK | +43% |
| Equity | 1.7M NOK | +189% |
| Employees | — | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Compend AS reported revenue of NOK 273.8k, a decrease of 66% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 3 annual filings covering 2023 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 3.5m, and the EBITDA margin stood at -1,161.3%.
At the end of 2025, equity financed 32.1% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 1.2 times.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 274 | 801 | 500 |
| Staff expenses | -2,870 | -2,160 | -457 |
| EBITDA | -3,180 | -1,678 | -221 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -291 | -38 | -0 |
| EBIT | -3,471 | -1,716 | -221 |
| Net financials | 8 | -5 | -0 |
| Profit before tax | -3,463 | -1,721 | -221 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -3,463 | -1,721 | -221 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 5,240 | 3,662 | 1,018 |
| Equity | 1,683 | -1,888 | 823 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 4,491 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 1,557 | 1,059 | 195 |
| Total debt | 3,557 | 5,550 | 195 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
KA Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2026 |
AA Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2023 – 2026 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (4) | ||
EE Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2026 |
TP Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2026 |
GL Chairman | Chairman | 2026 |
KA Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2026 |
AA Deputy Chairman | Deputy Chairman | 2023 – 2026 |
HA Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2023 – 2026 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 48.21% | 48.21% | 2025 | |
| Company | 40.98% | 40.98% | 2025 | |
| Company | 8.9% | 8.9% | 2025 | |
| Company | 1.03% | 1.03% | 2025 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Espen Evensen | Board of Directors | 10 companiesMany roles |
| Audun Andreassen | Chief Executive Officer | 8 companiesMany roles |
| Truls Pedersen | Board of Directors | 5 companies |
| Geir Lillehovde | Chairman | 5 companies |
| Kristian Andreas Ulen | Chief Executive Officer | 4 companies |
| Håkon Andreassen | Board of Directors | 3 companies |