CHAPS ApS
APSDissolvedCVR 14221042Lille Skindersøvej 3, 3140 ÅlsgårdeTravel agency activities· NACE 7911Est. 1990 · 36 years old1 employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessCHAPS ApS is a Danish APS based in Ålsgårde, operating in the Travel agency activities sector. Incorporated in 1990, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of -DKK 5.0k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | -5K DKK | -38% |
| EBITDA | 39.6K DKK | -41% |
| Net profit | 39.5K DKK | -41% |
| Total assets | 0K DKK | -100% |
| Equity | -111.7K DKK | +26% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2024), CHAPS ApS reported a gross profit of -DKK 5.0k. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2020 to 2024. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 39.5k.
At the end of 2024, current assets covered short-term debt 0 times.
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | -5 | -8 | -7 | -3 | -11 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | 40 | 67 | 43 | 47 | -15 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | 40 | 67 | 43 | 47 | -15 |
| Net financials | -0 | 0 | -0 | -0 | 0 |
| Profit before tax | 40 | 67 | 43 | 47 | -15 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | 40 | 67 | 43 | 47 | -15 |
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Equity | -112 | -151 | -218 | -261 | -309 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 112 | 152 | 219 | 263 | 311 |
| Total debt | 112 | 152 | 219 | 263 | 311 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
AN Management | Management | 1990 – 2026 |
ET | Audit | 1990 – 1991 |
SS Management | Management | 1990 – 1991 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
AN Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1990 – 2026 |
PM Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2017 – 2026 |
PE Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1990 – 1991 |
LP Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1990 – 1994 |
MJ Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1990 – 2017 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 100% | 100% | 1990 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Per Emil Hasselbalch Stakemann | Board of Directors | 236 companiesMany roles |
| Susanne Saul Stakemann | Management | 56 companiesMany roles |
| Erik Tronborg Andersen | Audit | 2 companies |
| Mikael Jensen | Board of Directors | 2 companies |
| Anne-Grethe Nygaard-Jensen | Management | 1 company |
| Pernille Maria Nygaard-Jensen | Board of Directors | 1 company |