K. Toft 2 ApS is a Danish APS based in København K, operating in the Beverage serving activities sector. Incorporated in 1997, the company has 7 employees.
| Gross profit | — | — |
| EBITDA | -8.6K DKK | +87% |
| Net profit | -13.5K DKK | +81% |
| Total assets | 879.5K DKK | -2% |
| Equity | -787.4K DKK | -2% |
| Employees | 7 | — |
The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2018 to 2022. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 13.5k.
At the end of 2022, current assets covered short-term debt 0.5 times.
| Item | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | — | -67 | -147 | 1,092 | 57 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -4 | -576 | -601 |
| EBITDA | -9 | -67 | -151 | 501 | -471 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | 37 |
| EBIT | -9 | -67 | -151 | 501 | -507 |
| Net financials | -5 | -4 | -42 | -44 | -11 |
| Profit before tax | -14 | -72 | -192 | 456 | -518 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -14 | -72 | -192 | 456 | -518 |
| Item | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 879 | 900 | 997 | 1,570 | 870 |
| Equity | -787 | -774 | -702 | -510 | -966 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 784 |
| Short-term debt | 1,667 | 1,674 | 1,699 | 2,080 | 1,052 |
| Total debt | 1,667 | 1,674 | 1,699 | 2,080 | 1,836 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
JK Management | Management | 2014 – 2014 |
KT Management | Management | 2019 – 2020 |
MT Management | Management | 2014 – 2015 |
HØ Management | Management | 2015 – 2018 |
PE Management | Management | 1997 – 1998 |
CS Management | Management | 2020 – 2020 |
HH Management | Management | 1998 – 1998 |
MV Management | Management | 2014 – 2015 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
CB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1999 – 2000 |
HH Chairman | Chairman | 1999 – 2000 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2015 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Per Emil Hasselbalch Stakemann | Management | 236 companiesMany roles |
| Michael Thalbitzer Thiberg | Management | 14 companiesMany roles |
| Christian Steen Laursen | Management | 6 companiesMany roles |
| Martin Vagn Andersson Loran | Management | 4 companies |
| Henrik Øgendahl | Management | 1 company |
| Hans Henrik Palm | Management | 1 company |
| Charlotte Bering | Board of Directors | 1 company |