Tomkla A/S is a Danish A/S based in Ribe, operating in the Retail sale of clothing sector. Incorporated in 1999, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of DKK 1.1m in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | 1.1M DKK | +5% |
| EBITDA | 0M DKK | +136% |
| Net profit | -0.1M DKK | +67% |
| Total assets | 1.7M DKK | -1% |
| Equity | -0.3M DKK | -53% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2015), Tomkla A/S reported a gross profit of DKK 1.1m, an increase of 5% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 4 annual filings covering 2012 to 2015. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 115.2k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 4.5%.
At the end of 2015, current assets covered short-term debt 0.9 times.
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | 1,109 | 1,051 | 1,139 | 1,263 |
| Staff expenses | -1,059 | -1,190 | -1,193 | -1,098 |
| EBITDA | 50 | -139 | -54 | 165 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -56 | -55 | -50 | -75 |
| EBIT | -6 | -194 | -104 | 91 |
| Net financials | -109 | -97 | -85 | -81 |
| Profit before tax | -115 | -290 | -188 | 9 |
| Tax | -0 | 62 | -41 | 3 |
| Net profit | -115 | -352 | -147 | 6 |
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 1,661 | 1,680 | 1,995 | 2,145 |
| Equity | -332 | -217 | 135 | 282 |
| Long-term debt | 289 | 348 | 187 | 248 |
| Short-term debt | 1,705 | 1,549 | 1,673 | 1,615 |
| Total debt | 1,994 | 1,898 | 1,859 | 1,863 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
TM Management | Management | 1999 – 2017 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
MB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1999 – 2010 |
TM Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1999 – 2017 |
JS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 1999 – 2000 |
KB Chairman | Chairman | 1999 – 2017 |
SC Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2000 – 2017 |
VB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2010 – 2017 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 50–66.65% | 50–66.65% | 1999 | |
| Company | 50–66.65% | 50–66.65% | 2005 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Klavs Breckling | Chairman | 5 companies |
| Jens Simonsen | Board of Directors | 3 companies |
| Søren Christensen | Board of Directors | 3 companies |
| Tom Meyer Andreasen | Management | 1 company |
| Mads Breckling | Board of Directors | 1 company |
| Viktor Breckling | Board of Directors | 1 company |