BSI HOLDING ApS is a Danish APS based in Haderslev, operating in the Ikke-finansielle holdingselskaber sector. Incorporated in 1999.
| Gross profit | — | — |
| EBITDA | 1M DKK | +615% |
| Net profit | 13M DKK | +683% |
| Total assets | 0M DKK | -100% |
| Equity | -4.2M DKK | +76% |
| Employees | — | — |
The figures on this page draw on 3 annual filings covering 2012 to 2014. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 13.0m.
At the end of 2014, current assets covered short-term debt 0.4 times.
| Item | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — | 0 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | 1,038 | 145 | -31 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | 1,038 | 145 | -31 |
| Net financials | 11,946 | -2,202 | -679 |
| Profit before tax | 12,984 | -2,232 | -710 |
| Tax | -0 | -5 | -53 |
| Net profit | 12,984 | -2,227 | -657 |
| Item | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 3 | 1,935 | 3,965 |
| Equity | -4,158 | -17,142 | -14,915 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 6 | 19,077 | 18,879 |
| Total debt | 4,160 | 19,077 | 18,879 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
EQ Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2008 – 2009 |
JR Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2009 – 2013 |
MM Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2013 – 2015 |
PH Management | Management | 1999 – 2008 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
TJ Chairman | Chairman | 2011 – 2015 |
CF Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2009 – 2014 |
EQ Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2011 – 2015 |
TA Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2009 – 2011 |
NT Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2014 – 2015 |
PH Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2002 – 2008 |
FB Chairman | Chairman | 2010 – 2011 |
HB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2009 – 2010 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2014 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Carsten Friis | Board of Directors | 32 companiesMany roles |
| Herluf Baun Høst | Board of Directors | 22 companiesMany roles |
| Thomas Jørgensen Bjerrum | Chairman | 10 companiesMany roles |
| Morten Madsen | Chief Executive Officer | 7 companiesMany roles |
| Jørgen Rudbeck Seeberg | Chief Executive Officer | 3 companies |
| Poul Hansen Bek | Management | 2 companies |
| Finn Buus Nielsen | Chairman | 2 companies |