Saxo Soft A/S
A/SIn liquidationCVR 27675174Philip Heymans Alle 15, 2900 HellerupKonsulentbistand vedrørende informationsteknologi· NACE 620200Est. 2004 · 22 years old— employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessSaxo Soft A/S is a Danish A/S based in Hellerup, operating in the Konsulentbistand vedrørende informationsteknologi sector. Incorporated in 2004.
| Gross profit | — | — |
| EBITDA | -284K DKK | -38% |
| Net profit | 76K DKK | +127% |
| Total assets | 25K DKK | -80% |
| Equity | -649K DKK | +10% |
| Employees | — | — |
The figures on this page draw on 2 annual filings covering 2012 to 2013. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 76.0k.
At the end of 2013, current assets covered short-term debt 0 times.
| Item | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | — | -75 |
| Staff expenses | -137 | -131 |
| EBITDA | -284 | -206 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | -284 | -206 |
| Net financials | -16 | 10 |
| Profit before tax | -300 | -196 |
| Tax | -376 | 84 |
| Net profit | 76 | -280 |
| Item | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 25 | 124 |
| Equity | -649 | -724 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 674 | 848 |
| Total debt | 674 | 848 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
EH Management | Management | 2011 – 2014 |
TA Management | Management | 2007 – 2011 |
KF Management | Management | 2004 – 2007 |
OR Management | Management | 2004 – 2007 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
EF Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2004 – 2007 |
EH Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2007 – 2014 |
AR Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2009 – 2014 |
MV Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2007 – 2010 |
SP Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2004 – 2008 |
SS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2006 – 2007 |
KE Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2004 – 2006 |
BK Chairman | Chairman | 2010 – 2014 |
JP Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2009 |
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Kim Fournais | Management | 8 companiesMany roles |
| Michael Villi Møller | Board of Directors | 4 companies |
| Shailendra Patel | Board of Directors | 2 companies |
| Bjørn Krog Andersen | Chairman | 2 companies |