BAD 2022 ApS is a Danish APS based in Frederikshavn, operating in the Psykologisk rådgivning sector. Incorporated in 2006, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of DKK 85.8k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | 85.8K DKK | -63% |
| EBITDA | 78.3K DKK | -5% |
| Net profit | 60.9K DKK | -12% |
| Total assets | 122.2K DKK | +9% |
| Equity | 12.3K DKK | +125% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2021), BAD 2022 ApS reported a gross profit of DKK 85.8k, a decrease of 63% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2017 to 2021. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 60.9k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 91.4%.
At the end of 2021, equity financed 10.1% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 0.7 times.
| Item | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | 86 | 234 | 202 | 255 | 1,116 |
| Staff expenses | -7 | -117 | -203 | -276 | -854 |
| EBITDA | 78 | 82 | -1 | -21 | 262 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -11 | -11 | -11 | -17 | -11 |
| EBIT | 67 | 72 | -12 | -38 | 251 |
| Net financials | -6 | -2 | -5 | -9 | -10 |
| Profit before tax | 61 | 69 | -17 | -47 | 242 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | 2 | 58 |
| Net profit | 61 | 69 | -17 | -49 | 183 |
| Item | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 122 | 112 | 146 | 346 | 266 |
| Equity | 12 | -49 | -118 | 31 | 7 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 110 | 161 | 264 | 315 | 259 |
| Total debt | 110 | 161 | 264 | 315 | 259 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
BA Management | Management | 2006 – 2022 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
BA Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 – 2023 |
CB Chairman | Chairman | 2019 – 2023 |
PB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2015 – 2019 |
TB Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 – 2023 |
RM Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2015 – 2017 |
IS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2018 – 2019 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 100% | 100% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2019 | |
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2012 | |
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2012 | |
| Company | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2018 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2019 | |
| Individual | 50–66.65% | 20–24.99% | 2019 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2019 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25% | 2018 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2019 | |
| Individual | 5–9.99% | 5–9.99% | 2016 | |
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2016 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Carsten Bernhardt Thomsen | Chairman | 1 company |
| Tania Buhelt Leer | Board of Directors | 1 company |
| Rikke Munk Madsen | Board of Directors | 1 company |
| Inge Staub Nielsen | Board of Directors | 1 company |