HIRLAP FINANS ApS is a Danish APS based in Aarhus C, operating in the Economic activity was not specified by tax authority sector. Incorporated in 2008, the company reported revenue of DKK 0 in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 0K DKK | — |
| EBITDA | -21.1K DKK | +22% |
| Net profit | -54.7K DKK | +7% |
| Total assets | 287.4K DKK | -9% |
| Equity | -329.6K DKK | -20% |
| Employees | — | — |
In its most recent annual report (2013), HIRLAP FINANS ApS reported revenue of DKK 0. The figures on this page draw on 2 annual filings covering 2012 to 2013. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 54.7k.
At the end of 2013, current assets covered short-term debt 14.4 times.
| Item | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 0 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | -21 | -27 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | -21 | -27 |
| Net financials | -34 | -32 |
| Profit before tax | -55 | -59 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -55 | -59 |
| Item | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 287 | 315 |
| Equity | -330 | -275 |
| Long-term debt | 597 | 562 |
| Short-term debt | 20 | 28 |
| Total debt | 617 | 590 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
MC Management | Management | 2011 – 2013 |
AR Management | Management | 2008 – 2009 |
JK Management | Management | 2010 – 2011 |
PW Management | Management | 2009 – 2010 |
LP Liquidator | Liquidator | 2013 – 2014 |
KS Management | Management | 2008 – 2008 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
JJ Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2008 |
BF Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2013 |
BR Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2013 |
JG Chairman | Chairman | 2008 – 2008 |
JN Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2013 |
KS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2008 |
PI Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2008 – 2013 |
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Klaus Søgaard | Management | 19 companiesMany roles |
| Arne Robert Bindslev | Management | 11 companiesMany roles |
| Jesper Korsbæk Jensen | Management | 11 companiesMany roles |
| Jan-Erik Gunnar Svensson | Chairman | 10 companiesMany roles |
| Mikkel Christian Hesselberg | Management | 9 companiesMany roles |
| Jens Jakob Skaadstrup Andersen | Board of Directors | 8 companiesMany roles |
| Brian Feldborg Damm | Board of Directors | 5 companies |
| Jørn Nielsen | Board of Directors | 3 companies |
| Peter Westphal | Management | 2 companies |
| Lotte Pinstrup Eskesen | Liquidator | 2 companies |