ABILD CONSULTING ApS
APSIn liquidationAdvertising protectionCVR 32948901Lejrevej 46, 4320 LejreEngineering activities and related technical consultancy· NACE 7112Est. 2010 · 16 years old1 employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessABILD CONSULTING ApS is a Danish APS based in Lejre, operating in the Engineering activities and related technical consultancy sector. Incorporated in 2010, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of DKK 933.3k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | 933.3K DKK | +89% |
| EBITDA | 468K DKK | +580% |
| Net profit | 286.1K DKK | +279% |
| Total assets | 911.3K DKK | +191% |
| Equity | 37.6K DKK | +115% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2016), ABILD CONSULTING ApS reported a gross profit of DKK 933.3k, an increase of 89% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2012 to 2016. The bottom line showed a net profit of DKK 286.1k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 50.1%.
At the end of 2016, equity financed 4.1% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 1 times.
| Item | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 933 | 494 | 2,145 | -1,628 | 370 |
| Staff expenses | -465 | -591 | -2,218 | -1,562 | -142 |
| EBITDA | 468 | -97 | -73 | 194 | 88 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -65 | -65 | -65 | -68 | 65 |
| EBIT | 403 | -163 | -138 | 126 | 23 |
| Net financials | -25 | -43 | -34 | -23 | -17 |
| Profit before tax | 378 | -206 | -24 | 149 | 6 |
| Tax | 92 | -46 | 74 | -3 | -2 |
| Net profit | 286 | -160 | -98 | 152 | 9 |
| Item | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 911 | 313 | 821 | 827 | 621 |
| Equity | 38 | -249 | -88 | 10 | 161 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 874 | 562 | 909 | -817 | 460 |
| Total debt | 874 | 562 | 909 | -817 | 460 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
FE Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2010 – 2016 |
KG Liquidator | Liquidator | 2016 – 2017 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
PF Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2010 – 2016 |
MK Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2010 – 2016 |
HO Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2010 – 2016 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 100% | 100% | 2013 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Klaus Graversen | Liquidator | 12 companiesMany roles |