LPH LIVING ApS is a Danish APS based in Aalborg SV, operating in the Economic activity was not specified by tax authority sector. Incorporated in 2010, the company reported a gross profit of -DKK 12.6k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | -12.6K DKK | +1% |
| EBITDA | -12.6K DKK | -1% |
| Net profit | -14.2K DKK | +93% |
| Total assets | 24.8K DKK | -36% |
| Equity | -137.9K DKK | -11% |
| Employees | — | — |
In its most recent annual report (2015), LPH LIVING ApS reported a gross profit of -DKK 12.6k. The figures on this page draw on 4 annual filings covering 2012 to 2015. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 14.2k.
At the end of 2015, current assets covered short-term debt 0.2 times.
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | -13 | -12 | 944 | -77 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -28 | -0 |
| EBITDA | -13 | -12 | 915 | -77 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | -13 | -12 | 915 | -77 |
| Net financials | -6 | -256 | -3 | -2 |
| Profit before tax | -19 | -268 | 912 | -79 |
| Tax | -4 | -64 | 228 | -20 |
| Net profit | -14 | -204 | 684 | -59 |
| Item | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 25 | 39 | 4,387 | 28,380 |
| Equity | -138 | -124 | 629 | — |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 163 | 162 | 3,758 | 28,435 |
| Total debt | 163 | 162 | 3,758 | 28,435 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
KA Management | Management | 2010 – 2017 |
JE Management | Management | 2010 – 2011 |
BS Management | Management | 2013 – 2014 |
No data on file.
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2011 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Bent Stamer | Management | 13 companiesMany roles |
| Jesper Ek Lorenzen | Management | 9 companiesMany roles |
| Kurt Aage Larsen | Management | 2 companies |