PAPERMINT DESIGN ApS
APSBankruptCVR 33391706Brannersvej 21, 2920 CharlottenlundKommunikationsdesign og grafisk design· NACE 741020Est. 2011 · 15 years old1 employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessPAPERMINT DESIGN ApS is a Danish APS based in Charlottenlund, operating in the Kommunikationsdesign og grafisk design sector. Incorporated in 2011, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of DKK 2.9k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | 2.9K DKK | -99% |
| EBITDA | -28.7K DKK | -17% |
| Net profit | -82.6K DKK | -18% |
| Total assets | 300.1K DKK | -24% |
| Equity | -105.9K DKK | -356% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2018), PAPERMINT DESIGN ApS reported a gross profit of DKK 2.9k, a decrease of 99% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2014 to 2018. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 82.6k, and the EBITDA margin stood at -993.6%.
At the end of 2018, current assets covered short-term debt 0.3 times.
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | 3 | 300 | 454 | 499 | 457 |
| Staff expenses | -32 | -324 | -427 | -427 | -341 |
| EBITDA | -29 | -24 | 27 | 72 | -18 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -41 | -41 | -58 | -48 | -49 |
| EBIT | -69 | -65 | -31 | 24 | -67 |
| Net financials | -5 | -8 | -25 | -4 | -8 |
| Profit before tax | -75 | -74 | -56 | 20 | -6 |
| Tax | 8 | -4 | -3 | 17 | 27 |
| Net profit | -83 | -70 | -53 | 4 | -33 |
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 300 | 393 | 555 | 679 | 739 |
| Equity | -106 | -23 | 47 | 140 | 136 |
| Long-term debt | 134 | 161 | 188 | 14 | 56 |
| Short-term debt | 272 | 255 | 320 | 524 | 544 |
| Total debt | 406 | 416 | 508 | 539 | 600 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
MA Management | Management | 2011 – 2020 |
PB Liquidator | Liquidator | 2020 – 2020 |
No data on file.
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 25–33.32% | 25–33.32% | 2013 | |
| Individual | 66.67–89.99% | 66.67–89.99% | 2011 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Pernille Bigaard | Liquidator | 40 companiesMany roles |