CS3 SYSTEMS ApS
APSBankruptAdvertising protectionCVR 34451486Regnspovevej 7, 3310 ØlstedManufacture of bicycles and invalid carriages· NACE 3092Est. 2012 · 14 years old1 employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessCS3 SYSTEMS ApS is a Danish APS based in Ølsted, operating in the Manufacture of bicycles and invalid carriages sector. Incorporated in 2012, the company has 1 employee and reported a gross profit of DKK 93.7k in its latest annual filing.
| Gross profit | 93.7K DKK | -74% |
| EBITDA | -143.8K DKK | -148% |
| Net profit | -157.1K DKK | -154% |
| Total assets | 100K DKK | -61% |
| Equity | -368K DKK | -74% |
| Employees | 1 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2018), CS3 SYSTEMS ApS reported a gross profit of DKK 93.7k, a decrease of 74% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2014 to 2018. The bottom line showed a net loss of DKK 157.1k, and the EBITDA margin stood at -153.4%.
At the end of 2018, current assets covered short-term debt 0.2 times.
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross profit | 94 | 360 | 137 | -22 | -13 |
| Staff expenses | -238 | -58 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | -144 | 302 | 137 | -22 | -13 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -12 | -12 | -19 |
| EBIT | -144 | 302 | 125 | -34 | -32 |
| Net financials | -13 | -10 | -11 | -13 | -13 |
| Profit before tax | -157 | 292 | 114 | -47 | -45 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -157 | 292 | 114 | -47 | -45 |
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 100 | 257 | 152 | 12 | 50 |
| Equity | -368 | -211 | -503 | -617 | -569 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 468 | 468 | 655 | 629 | 619 |
| Total debt | 468 | 468 | 655 | 629 | 619 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|
BF Management | Management | 2013 – 2014 |
FI Audit | Audit | 2013 – 2014 |
SE Management | Management | 2014 – 2020 |
MM Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2012 – 2019 |
No data on file.
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 50–66.65% | 50–66.65% | 2012 | |
| Individual | 50–66.65% | 50–66.65% | 2012 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Flemming Israelsen | Audit | 3 companies |