Versta Oy is a Finnish OY based in Espoo, operating in the Logging sector. Incorporated in 2018, the company has 3,112 employees and reported revenue of €183.3k in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 183.3K EUR | -3% |
| EBITDA | 34.1K EUR | +102% |
| Net profit | 21.2K EUR | +724% |
| Total assets | 49.8K EUR | +25% |
| Equity | 5.7K EUR | +137% |
| Employees | 3,112 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Versta Oy reported revenue of €183.3k, a decrease of 3% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2021 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net profit of €21.2k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 18.6%.
At the end of 2025, equity financed 11.4% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 0.7 times.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 183 | 189 | 172 | 166 | 123 |
| Staff expenses | -47 | -37 | -40 | -43 | -65 |
| EBITDA | 34 | 17 | 12 | 27 | 4 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -10 | -10 | -13 | -16 | -21 |
| EBIT | 24 | 7 | -1 | 11 | -17 |
| Net financials | -2 | -5 | -5 | -4 | -3 |
| Profit before tax | 22 | 3 | -6 | 7 | -20 |
| Tax | 1 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | 21 | 3 | -6 | 7 | -20 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 50 | 40 | 53 | 75 | 108 |
| Equity | 6 | -16 | -18 | -12 | -19 |
| Long-term debt | 15 | 38 | 58 | 77 | 90 |
| Short-term debt | 29 | 17 | 13 | 10 | 38 |
| Total debt | 44 | 55 | 71 | 87 | 127 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (2) | ||
AJ Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2018 |
KH Deputy Member | Deputy Member | 2018 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
AJ Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2018 |
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Kirsi Helena Maria Romanoff | Deputy Member | 2 companies |
| Anton Jukka Krook | Chief Executive Officer | 1 company |