Defender AS is a Norwegian AS based in Vear, operating in the Industrial product and fashion design activities sector. Incorporated in 2015, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 0 in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 0K NOK | — |
| EBITDA | -38.2K NOK | +33% |
| Net profit | -29.8K NOK | +34% |
| Total assets | 554.3K NOK | -1% |
| Equity | -629.3K NOK | -5% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Defender AS reported revenue of NOK 0, a decrease of 100% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2021 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 29.8k.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 0 | 48 | 0 | 96 | 0 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | -38 | -57 | -146 | -166 | -43 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | -38 | -57 | -146 | -166 | -43 |
| Net financials | -0 | -0 | 0 | -0 | -95 |
| Profit before tax | -38 | -57 | -146 | -166 | -138 |
| Tax | -8 | -13 | -510 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -30 | -45 | 364 | -166 | -138 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 554 | 557 | 562 | 150 | 491 |
| Equity | -629 | -600 | -555 | -918 | -752 |
| Long-term debt | 1,185 | 1,158 | 1,113 | 1,061 | 1,047 |
| Short-term debt | -2 | -1 | 4 | 8 | 196 |
| Total debt | 1,184 | 1,157 | 1,117 | 1,069 | 1,243 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
FL Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2015 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (4) | ||
OK Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2021 |
FL Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2015 |
SS Chairman | Chairman | 2024 |
TS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2021 |
BN Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2015 – 2021 |
HW Chairman | Chairman | 2021 – 2024 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 24.49% | 24.49% | 2021 | |
| Company | 24.49% | 24.49% | 2021 | |
| Individual | 17.24% | 17.24% | 2021 | |
| Company | 15.66% | 15.66% | 2021 | |
| Company | 11.07% | 11.07% | 2021 | |
| Company | 7.04% | 7.04% | 2021 | |
| Company | 15% | 15% | 2020 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Tore Staveland | Board of Directors | 46 companiesMany roles |
| Sigurd Stokke | Chairman | 26 companiesMany roles |
| Olav Kaarstein | Board of Directors | 9 companiesMany roles |
| Heine Wang | Chairman | 9 companiesMany roles |
| Finn Limseth | Chief Executive Officer | 7 companiesMany roles |
| Bjørn Næss | Board of Directors | 1 company |