Optimal Security AS
ASBankruptOrg 891935242Østregate 3, 4790 LillesandOther education n.e.c.· NACE 8559Est. 2007 · 18 years old0 employeeshttps://www.triarii.no
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessOptimal Security AS is a Norwegian AS based in Lillesand, operating in the Other education n.e.c. sector. Incorporated in 2007, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 2.0m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 2M NOK | -23% |
| EBITDA | 0M NOK | -88% |
| Net profit | -0.3M NOK | -672% |
| Total assets | 3.1M NOK | +2% |
| Equity | -1.1M NOK | -38% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2024), Optimal Security AS reported revenue of NOK 2.0m, a decrease of 23% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2020 to 2024. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 312.0k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 2.2%.
At the end of 2024, current assets covered short-term debt 0.2 times.
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,963 | 2,562 | 2,556 | 968 | 1,138 |
| Staff expenses | -1,479 | -1,874 | -1,751 | -927 | -1,010 |
| EBITDA | 42 | 357 | 465 | -209 | -195 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -141 | -138 | -12 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | -98 | 219 | 453 | -209 | -195 |
| Net financials | -214 | -164 | -77 | -28 | -32 |
| Profit before tax | -312 | 55 | 376 | -237 | -227 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -312 | 55 | 376 | -237 | -227 |
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 3,088 | 3,023 | 3,231 | 255 | 345 |
| Equity | -1,140 | -828 | -883 | -1,259 | -1,023 |
| Long-term debt | 1,758 | 1,890 | 807 | 500 | 0 |
| Short-term debt | 2,471 | 1,961 | 3,307 | 1,014 | 1,367 |
| Total debt | 4,228 | 3,852 | 4,114 | 1,514 | 1,367 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (2) | ||
OV Trustee | Trustee | 2026 |
CA Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2026 |
LK Contact Person | Contact Person | 2014 – 2026 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
CA Chairman | Chairman | 2026 |
LK Chairman | Chairman | 2017 – 2026 |
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Olaf Vaboen | Trustee | 58 companiesMany roles |
| Lars Kristian Sundtoft | Contact Person | 3 companies |
| Cecilie Askbo | Chief Executive Officer | 1 company |