Intro Designstudio AS
ASDissolvedOrg 913727495Professor Birkelands Vei 24C, 1081 OsloReal estate activities with own property and development of building projects· NACE 6810Est. 2014 · 12 years old0 employees
Loading company…
Riskpilot← Back to searchSign inGet full accessIntro Designstudio AS is a Norwegian AS based in Oslo, operating in the Real estate activities with own property and development of building projects sector. Incorporated in 2014, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 1.9m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 1.9M NOK | -40% |
| EBITDA | 0.3M NOK | -27% |
| Net profit | 0M NOK | -99% |
| Total assets | 0.6M NOK | -24% |
| Equity | 0.3M NOK | +118% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2018), Intro Designstudio AS reported revenue of NOK 1.9m, a decrease of 40% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2014 to 2018. The bottom line showed a net profit of NOK 4.1k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 18.1%.
At the end of 2018, equity financed 50.6% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 0 times.
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,883 | 3,136 | 1,608 | 1,542 | 276 |
| Staff expenses | -497 | -704 | -403 | -769 | -209 |
| EBITDA | 342 | 470 | -28 | -647 | -217 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -248 | -210 | -172 | -135 | -16 |
| EBIT | 93 | 260 | -200 | -782 | -234 |
| Net financials | -67 | 57 | -92 | -708 | -9 |
| Profit before tax | 26 | 317 | -292 | -1,490 | -242 |
| Tax | 22 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | 4 | 317 | -292 | -1,490 | -242 |
| Item | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 599 | 790 | 778 | 749 | 1,613 |
| Equity | 303 | -1,666 | -1,983 | -1,691 | -201 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 1,890 | 1,975 | 2,000 | 1,400 |
| Short-term debt | 296 | 566 | 786 | 440 | 414 |
| Total debt | 296 | 2,456 | 2,761 | 2,440 | 1,814 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
HE Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2019 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (3) | ||
LE Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 |
HE Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 |
HA Chairman | Chairman | 2019 |
MK Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 – 2019 |
No shareholder data available.
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Line Enger Nygaard | Board of Directors | 7 companiesMany roles |
| Heidi Estanse Hadeln Steen | Chief Executive Officer | 3 companies |
| Mia Kjeldstad Hansen | Board of Directors | 3 companies |
| Herman Arne Aass | Chairman | 2 companies |