3D Learning AS is a Norwegian AS based in Sandefjord, operating in the Engineering activities and related technical consultancy sector. Incorporated in 2015, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 581.2k in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 0.6M NOK | -34% |
| EBITDA | -1.8M NOK | -84% |
| Net profit | -2.8M NOK | -84% |
| Total assets | 1.9M NOK | 0% |
| Equity | -9.4M NOK | -43% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2024), 3D Learning AS reported revenue of NOK 581.2k, a decrease of 34% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2020 to 2024. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 2.8m, and the EBITDA margin stood at -314.9%.
At the end of 2024, current assets covered short-term debt 2.7 times.
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 581 | 884 | 3,031 | 1,570 | 1,899 |
| Staff expenses | -1,136 | -944 | -741 | -880 | -971 |
| EBITDA | -1,830 | -995 | 335 | -175 | -99 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -389 | -116 | -1,052 | -1,301 | -1,227 |
| EBIT | -2,219 | -1,111 | -716 | -1,476 | -1,327 |
| Net financials | -606 | -423 | -213 | -142 | -137 |
| Profit before tax | -2,825 | -1,534 | -930 | -1,618 | -1,464 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | -2,825 | -1,534 | -930 | -1,618 | -1,464 |
| Item | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 1,868 | 1,865 | 989 | 1,238 | 2,970 |
| Equity | -9,416 | -6,590 | -5,056 | -4,126 | -2,508 |
| Long-term debt | 10,956 | 8,208 | 5,455 | 5,052 | 5,001 |
| Short-term debt | 328 | 248 | 589 | 312 | 478 |
| Total debt | 11,284 | 8,456 | 6,045 | 5,364 | 5,479 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (2) | ||
HX Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2016 |
ES Trustee | Trustee | 2025 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (3) | ||
HX Chairman | Chairman | 2020 |
SS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2020 |
HJ Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2026 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | 25% | 25% | 2020 | |
| Company | 50% | 50% | 2020 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Espen Skjerven | Trustee | 142 companiesMany roles |
| Hedvig Juell | Board of Directors | 29 companiesMany roles |
| Hazel Xavier Venkatraman | Chief Executive Officer | 6 companiesMany roles |
| Shyam Sundar Venkatraman | Board of Directors | 4 companies |