Langstranda AS is a Norwegian AS based in Bodø, operating in the Rental and operating of own or leased real estate sector. Incorporated in 2020, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 2.7m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 2.7M NOK | -16% |
| EBITDA | 2.1M NOK | -10% |
| Net profit | -1.3M NOK | -17% |
| Total assets | 24.3M NOK | -6% |
| Equity | -6.9M NOK | -24% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Langstranda AS reported revenue of NOK 2.7m, a decrease of 16% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2021 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 1.3m, and the EBITDA margin stood at 77.8%.
At the end of 2025, current assets covered short-term debt 0.1 times.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2,678 | 3,207 | 2,448 | 1,463 | 706 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | 2,085 | 2,327 | 1,781 | 1,081 | -4,015 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -1,475 | -1,453 | -1,328 | -1,091 | -662 |
| EBIT | 609 | 874 | 453 | -10 | -4,676 |
| Net financials | -1,949 | -2,017 | -1,815 | -1,302 | -565 |
| Profit before tax | -1,340 | -1,142 | -1,362 | -1,312 | -5,241 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | 174 |
| Net profit | -1,340 | -1,142 | -1,362 | 2,931 | -5,415 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 24,301 | 25,898 | 26,805 | 23,613 | 16,332 |
| Equity | -6,916 | -5,576 | -4,433 | -3,071 | -6,001 |
| Long-term debt | 26,795 | 29,760 | 30,543 | 25,229 | 17,554 |
| Short-term debt | 4,422 | 1,713 | 695 | 1,455 | 4,779 |
| Total debt | 31,217 | 31,474 | 31,238 | 26,684 | 22,333 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
No data on file.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (3) | ||
EC Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2020 |
TH Chairman | Chairman | 2020 |
HT Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2020 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 49.5% | 49.5% | 2025 | |
| Company | 25.5% | 25.5% | 2025 | |
| Company | 25% | 25% | 2020 | |
| Company | 75% | 75% | 2020 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Even Carlsen | Board of Directors | 38 companiesMany roles |
| Hans Torger Austad | Board of Directors | 16 companiesMany roles |
| Tore Handberg | Chairman | 7 companiesMany roles |