Transpol AS is a Norwegian AS based in Førde, operating in the Painting and glazing sector. Incorporated in 1999, the company has 7 employees and reported revenue of NOK 4.7m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 4.7M NOK | +19% |
| EBITDA | 0.2M NOK | +344% |
| Net profit | 0.1M NOK | +181% |
| Total assets | 1M NOK | -3% |
| Equity | 0M NOK | +125% |
| Employees | 7 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Transpol AS reported revenue of NOK 4.7m, an increase of 19% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2021 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net profit of NOK 95.9k, and the EBITDA margin stood at 3.6%.
At the end of 2025, equity financed 1.9% of the balance sheet, and current assets covered short-term debt 0.3 times.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4,691 | 3,944 | 4,714 | 5,832 | 4,516 |
| Staff expenses | -2,803 | -2,328 | -3,240 | -3,309 | -3,074 |
| EBITDA | 168 | 38 | -376 | 704 | -429 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -31 | -110 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBIT | 137 | -72 | -376 | 704 | -429 |
| Net financials | -41 | -46 | -23 | -31 | -67 |
| Profit before tax | 96 | -118 | -400 | 672 | -496 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| Net profit | 96 | -118 | -400 | 672 | -496 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 994 | 1,026 | 1,323 | 1,919 | 2,243 |
| Equity | 19 | -77 | 42 | 441 | -231 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,129 |
| Short-term debt | 960 | 1,103 | 1,281 | 1,477 | 1,346 |
| Total debt | 975 | 1,103 | 1,281 | 1,477 | 2,474 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
TR Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2006 |
GH Deputy Member | Deputy Member | 2015 – 2015 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
TR Chairman | Chairman | 2015 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2020 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Geir Harald Kapstad | Deputy Member | 6 companiesMany roles |
| Thomas Rasmussen | Chief Executive Officer | 4 companies |