Mørstad Senter AS is a Norwegian AS based in Oslo, operating in the Rental and operating of own or leased real estate sector. Incorporated in 2005, the company has 0 employees and reported revenue of NOK 5.0m in its latest annual filing.
| Revenue | 5M NOK | -5% |
| EBITDA | 2.2M NOK | -38% |
| Net profit | -3.4M NOK | -63% |
| Total assets | 30.1M NOK | -6% |
| Equity | -5.5M NOK | -165% |
| Employees | 0 | — |
In its most recent annual report (2025), Mørstad Senter AS reported revenue of NOK 5.0m, a decrease of 5% on the year before. The figures on this page draw on 5 annual filings covering 2021 to 2025. The bottom line showed a net loss of NOK 3.4m, and the EBITDA margin stood at 43%.
At the end of 2025, current assets covered short-term debt 0.8 times.
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5,005 | 5,241 | 4,893 | 5,041 | 3,642 |
| Staff expenses | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
| EBITDA | 2,150 | 3,477 | 2,177 | 3,119 | 2,827 |
| Depreciation & amort. | -1,680 | -1,782 | -1,723 | -1,639 | -1,431 |
| EBIT | 471 | 1,695 | 453 | 1,480 | 1,396 |
| Net financials | -3,871 | -3,783 | -5,522 | -25 | -18 |
| Profit before tax | -3,401 | -2,087 | -5,069 | 1,455 | 1,378 |
| Tax | -0 | -0 | 99 | 320 | 303 |
| Net profit | -3,401 | -2,087 | -5,168 | 1,135 | 1,075 |
| Item | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets | 30,059 | 32,006 | 37,153 | 38,112 | 38,154 |
| Equity | -5,457 | -2,056 | 31 | 4,599 | 3,465 |
| Long-term debt | 0 | 0 | 34,795 | 31,075 | 30,613 |
| Short-term debt | 1,376 | 34,062 | 2,326 | 2,437 | 4,077 |
| Total debt | 35,515 | 34,062 | 37,121 | 33,512 | 34,690 |
28 financial ratios from the latest filing, each graded against companies in the same industry.
The gross result as a share of revenue — how much of the revenue is left after variable costs to cover the company's fixed costs.
EBIT as a share of revenue — the share of revenue remaining as earnings once all operating costs are covered. A key measure of earning power.
The profit for the year as a share of revenue — the company's ability to turn revenue into profit.
Net profit as a percentage of total assets — the return generated on the capital employed.
EBIT relative to total assets — the company's earning power before the effects of tax and financial leverage.
Shows how strongly fixed costs weigh on the gross result — a high ratio means fixed costs take only a small bite out of the earnings from basic operations.
Net profit as a percentage of equity — the return the owners earned on their invested capital this year.
Profit relative to net assets (total assets minus total debt) — the ability to generate earnings from the net asset base alone.
Current assets relative to short-term debt — the ability to settle short-term obligations with current assets alone. Around 150% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Current assets excluding inventory relative to short-term debt — whether the most liquid assets alone can cover the short-term obligations. A value of 1 or above signals a healthy liquidity position.
Cash relative to short-term debt — the ability to repay short-term obligations with cash alone.
Cash flow relative to profit — the ability to convert reported profits into accessible cash.
Current assets relative to equity — an indicator of the balance-sheet structure and of the company's short- and long-term financing. The healthy level is highly industry-dependent.
Fixed assets relative to long-term capital (equity plus long-term liabilities). Below 100% means the long-term capital finances more than just the fixed assets — a healthier liquidity position.
Equity as a share of total assets — the ability to absorb losses. Around 40% is considered satisfactory from a credit perspective.
Total debt relative to the balance-sheet total — the share of the assets financed by debt rather than equity.
Profit relative to debt — the ability to create earnings while operating with debt.
EBITDA relative to debt — how much operating earnings are available to service the debt.
The ability to pay the interest on the company's debt out of its earnings.
Financial expenses relative to total liabilities — the effective interest rate the company pays on its debt.
The return on assets minus the interest rate on debt. Positive means the company benefits from operating with debt; negative means the debt makes it worse off.
Debt relative to equity — the company's leverage. A higher value means heavier reliance on debt financing.
Total liabilities relative to equity — whether the company operates primarily on borrowed capital or on its own.
Revenue relative to total assets — the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Total equity relative to the capital the owners contributed — how the equity has developed from its starting point.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's debt.
Revenue relative to inventory — how many times a year the inventory is sold and replaced. A low value can indicate weak sales or excess inventory.
The size of this year's increase or decrease in the company's equity.
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (1) | ||
GS Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2022 |
OS Chief Executive Officer | Chief Executive Officer | 2020 – 2022 |
| Name | Role | Member since |
|---|---|---|
| Current (2) | ||
GS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 |
MS Chairman | Chairman | 2019 |
OS Board of Directors | Board of Directors | 2019 – 2022 |
| Shareholder | Type | Ownership | Votes | Registered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2022 | |
| Company | 100% | 100% | 2020 |
| Person | Role here | Other companies |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Siem | Chairman | 43 companiesMany roles |
| Geir Schjerpen Rønningen | Chief Executive Officer | 35 companiesMany roles |
| Ole Solbjørg | Chief Executive Officer | 8 companiesMany roles |